On Apr 22, 2013, at 8:12 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:00:22AM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote: > >> On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Ond?ej Sur? <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> a) do nothing >>> b) accept errata as is >>> c) start work on RFC6698bis and include this change >> >> (c) seems good, and Viktor has already said that he is willing to start on >> it. > > Sure, but I started work on an "operational guidance" I.-D. If we're > updating 6698, the content would be quite different. Which is the immediate > priority? A 6698 update or an operational guidance draft? My thought is to create the operational guidance draft first and then see whether the WG wants it separate or as a 6698bis. That decision can be made late. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
