On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:50:36PM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:36:30PM +0000, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> > > > Wed Jan 16 20:34:26 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > * Add --{allow,dont-allow,mark}-conflicts to darcs pull.
> > > >
> > > > This patch also merge the --external option to pull_conflicts_options
> > > > like with apply.
[...]
> Actually, I see that Nicolas is copying the current behavior of apply. I
> think a better rewrite here, however, would be to just rename
> apply_conflict_options to conflict_options, and then we'd have uniform
> behavior across the two commands. This also wouldn't be a change in the
> behavior of apply.
Unfortunately one problem with using the same option is that the
[DEFAULT] information is currently hard-coded in the option's
description, i.e., Pull and Apply can't have the same option
with different descriptions of which is the default.
Would it be acceptable to change the default for Apply to be the
same as for Pull?
--
Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
