Thomas Zander wrote:
Thinking a little about that, I note that the identification of a hunk or even a patch is non-trivial. It takes too much text, basically.
What is it about darcs that makes identifying the conflicting patch hard? Darcs is the first SCM I've used not to do this. Granted its the only distributed SCM I've used.
Naturally; if and when we have in place the concept of (local) numerical identification of patches that changes.
Whats wrong with the patch name I enter when recording a patch?
So, I suggest you add this to the bugtracker as a feature request for future reference.
Will do. -- Richard A. Smith Bitworks, Inc _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
