Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Well, *I* would say that's a strong indication that the code needs
review (only half-joking).
*grin* I hear ya. It wasn't anything _that_ complex though. Just some
text string changes and I knew that my version was what we had decided on.
Thanks for all your insight though. I'll guess I'll just have to wait
for the next round of patch theory to arrive.
In the mean time, Thomas's suggestion seems to hit the mark exactly.
--
Richard A. Smith
Bitworks, Inc
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
