Simon Michael wrote: > I also want to flag this situation as another road-bump for > contributors. Someone (like me) will send patches to the list by tools > other than darcs send, eg because they want to edit the message further > or keep the thread context. They will see their patch in the public > list, perhaps even see it discussed, but will have no idea that it has > fallen into a black hole, because the sole patch approver does not see > it. What could be done to make this more optimal ?
Also, if the above is correct, it means David does not see discussion of patches on-list, which makes our patch review process seem a bit.. broken, compared with git/hg/bzr's. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
