On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:47:38AM -0700, Simon Michael wrote: > Simon Michael wrote: > >I also want to flag this situation as another road-bump for > >contributors. Someone (like me) will send patches to the list by tools > >other than darcs send, eg because they want to edit the message further > >or keep the thread context. They will see their patch in the public > >list, perhaps even see it discussed, but will have no idea that it has > >fallen into a black hole, because the sole patch approver does not see > >it. What could be done to make this more optimal ? > > Also, if the above is correct, it means David does not see discussion of > patches on-list, which makes our patch review process seem a bit.. > broken, compared with git/hg/bzr's.
I do look at discussion of patches. Or rather, I would look at it, if it happened. -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
