On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:27:21AM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:17 AM, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:47:38AM -0700, Simon Michael wrote: > > > Simon Michael wrote: > > > >I also want to flag this situation as another road-bump for > > > >contributors. Someone (like me) will send patches to the list by tools > > > >other than darcs send, eg because they want to edit the message further > > > >or keep the thread context. They will see their patch in the public > > > >list, perhaps even see it discussed, but will have no idea that it has > > > >fallen into a black hole, because the sole patch approver does not see > > > >it. What could be done to make this more optimal ? > > > > > > Also, if the above is correct, it means David does not see discussion of > > > patches on-list, which makes our patch review process seem a bit.. > > > broken, compared with git/hg/bzr's. > > > > I do look at discussion of patches. Or rather, I would look at it, if > > it happened. > > > I think the question was more, "If I send a patch to only darcs-users@ will > David notice the email?" People, myself included, are not sure if you see > messages where you're not in the CC. I suspect it's just that you assume > you can ignore it unless you're in the CC, which means you read some but not > all of the darcs-user discussions. I think a related concern is that some > of us worry we might be spamming you if we intentionally put you in the CC > too often :)
Through gmail magic, if you send a patch to the list, I don't see it, but if you send a patch to me, and someone sends comments on said patch to the list, I see those comments. -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
