Hi, Simon Michael <[email protected]> writes: > Petr Rockai wrote: >> - .authorspellings (Simon) -- I find this to be controversial though > > Oh dear.. what would fix that ?
Well, it's a new incompatible way to dealing with repository settings. I am not opposed to a simpler system of preferences, in fact, I'd happily abolish setpref, since it sort of sucks anyway, but we should put up a plan or something, since now we risk having three incompatible preference systems in darcs, which is two too many (we had two before, which was merely one too many). I don't intend to put the burden on you personally, I'd just like to have some semi-clear consensus on where to go from here before committing to this new preference handling approach. Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
