Hi Mark,
Mark Stosberg wrote:
I was just using "darcs changes" with 2.4 and wanted to narrow down a
list of 20 patches.
I started with this:
darcs changes --reverse -i -p 7072
I saw the patches I wanted to focus on were 9 through 20, so I did this:
darcs changes --reverse -i -p 7072 -n 9-20
I expected to see 11 patches returned but the result was..2.
It appears that I get the same 2 patches when I exclude "--reverse".
So perhaps there is a bug when combining these flags. When --reverse
is used, shouldn't "--index" start counting from the other end?
are the indices you use consistent with the ones shown by --number? I
just noticed that the numbering does not change with --reverse; the
newest patch is always numbered 1.
Best,
Benedikt
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
