> are the indices you use consistent with the ones shown by --number? I > just noticed that the numbering does not change with --reverse; the > newest patch is always numbered 1.
Benedikt, I was not aware that I needed to use the output of number. This looks like a doc-bug then. In "darcs changes help", it current says this about --index: select a range of patches I believe it should say: select a range of patches base on --number values Mark _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
