On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:29:05PM -0600, Michael Hendricks wrote: > > I'd say that even the existing version of amend-record would be improved by > > issuing a warning (with a request for confirmation) if I change a patch that > > is also present in the default-repo. > > > > "Warning: This operation modifies a patch the exists in the default remote > > repo. Are you sure? [yN]" > > > > I agree.
I see the point, but it means that you wouldn't be able to amend-record without access to remote repo. No thanks, there is a reason why I use darcs rather than svn… Best, -- Gabriel _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
