On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]> wrote: > > At the moment the only consequences of violating that advice are that > you end up with conflicting patches that are quite similar and in > practice you need to figure out which one to keep and which one to > eradicate. > > If we allowed editing of A without changing the identity of B which > implicitly depends on A, then you would get the much more nasty effects > described in this thread. >
Because of the restricted edits that squash allows, I'm not entirely convinced the effects are worse than what we have now. I won't belabor the details. Obviously, if I still think it's possible, I should code it up and send patches. Patches speak louder than words :-) Thanks Ganesh, Florent and others for taking time to answer my questions. -- Michael
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
