On 3 Apr 2012, at 10:18, Gabriel Kerneis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:29:05PM -0600, Michael Hendricks wrote: >>> I'd say that even the existing version of amend-record would be improved by >>> issuing a warning (with a request for confirmation) if I change a patch that >>> is also present in the default-repo. >>> >>> "Warning: This operation modifies a patch the exists in the default remote >>> repo. Are you sure? [yN]"
Cue usual complaint about confirmation prompts (too easy to get in trouble by answering and then realise you didn't actually read the prompt, or understand what it meant) Better? Warning: You just modified patches which also exist in the default remote repo. This will likely cause a conflict. If this isn't what you wanted, try: darcs obliterate --last=42 darcs apply -i _darcs/backup/amend-2014-08-12.dpatch -- Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
