On 20/11/2013 00:07, Guillaume Hoffmann wrote:
I'm thinking more and more that darcs should have a behaviour similar
to the most known VCS', unless there is some *absolute* necessity (by
design or design principle) to do another way.
The default expected use of changes (or log) is to show the "history"
of a repository, and we cannot really fight this assumption.
So I propose we go back to non-interactive by default.
As of invoking the pager (a la git), good idea. We can indeed use the
same code as `darcs help`.
And to continue with the "least surprise" principle, I would go as far
as proposing that "changes" should be called "log" (an alias already
present in HEAD), and keep "changes" as an alias of "log".
I like this, but making "changes" an alias for "darcs log -i", thus
avoiding disruption for old-time darcsers.
--
Florent
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
