Le samedi 12 mars 2016 à 12:19 +0100, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit : > Did you also export pictures and sample the pixels? That might be > more precise > than relying on the video stack of a virtualization layer.
Good question, I don't remember. I've done that but can't be sure for all modules. > If that's the reason for the exposure scaling I think we should > ignore it. > Using exposure to compensate for unrelated changes is IMO very bad™. Frankly at this stage I don't really care if the exposure compensation is taken as-is. In any case it is impossible to have a 100% correct mapping. The exposure compensation here is very close to the Lr, so using the Lr value will support the OP usage which is probably more important than saving a click to adjust when important from Lr. All in all Tobias, if you agree I'll propose a patch. Cheers, -- Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination http://v2p.fr.eu.org http://www.obry.net gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
