As I admit being able to see informations on pictures that are not selected is of great value, being able to modify pictures that are not selected would in no way have to be possible.
Two suggestions : a- implement undo for every operation, should it concern one or all the pictures in the library. Quite complex and memory consuming, I guess. b- don't allow destructive operations on pictures that are not selected without explicit user confirmation. Yes, I know, suggestions are easy, doing is harder (I remember having been a programmer very long time ago...). Regards, J.-Luc > Message du 31/03/17 19:22 > De : dt-l...@stefan-klinger.de > A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.org > Copie à : > Objet : Re: focus-follows-mouse in DT UI (Re: [darktable-user] Reversing > history stack paste.) > > Colin Adams (2017-Mar-31, excerpt): > > On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 at 17:58 Pascal Obry wrote: > > > This looks like a feature to me and I use it this way to mark multiple > > > photos very close with the same rating and/or color. > > > > > > > Whereas to me it's a bug. > > I have to admit, Pascal does have a point here. They make the > software the way they like it. However quaint that may appear to me > and you, we could code our own solution. > > Actually I once tried to get into DT's code to find out why XMP and > database content can diverge, but when a DT-dev suggested to overwrite > a file although it has the ro-flag set, I gave up... > > Yes, to me it's a bug, too. > > > -- > http://stefan-klinger.de o/X > Send plain text messages only, not exceeding 32kB. /\/ > \ > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
