I've been a victim of my own inattentiveness and wiped all edits on
images in the library. It sucked but it was my fault. It would have
been nice to have either a write protect feature on edited images
(my preference) or an undo. In my case, the undo was backups. On 2017-04-16 08:54, Richard Vanek
wrote:
Two different issues, one protects the library (protected images) from inadvertent or accidental changes due to a "select all" vs the word processor concept of "infinite" undos. Whereas a document is just "one", images in lightroom can be thousands. Not being familiar with darktable code, I could see implementing an undo to be an exponential problem with very little in return for the effort and complexity to implement. I would think that there would also be a performance hit and the usability issues would be a nightmare. Is having an undo in lightroom for a single image really an issue? There's very little that can affect an image other than clobbering the history stack and one has to work at that. I think there are way cooler features/improvements to be implemented.... where does the time go?
____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org |
- [darktable-user] Undo in lightable? Richard Vanek
- Re: [darktable-user] Undo in lightable? Colin Adams
- Re: [darktable-user] Undo in lightable? Richard Vanek
- Re: [darktable-user] Undo in lightable? Pascal Obry
- Image write disable token instead? - Re:... Mark Heieis
- Re: Image write disable token inste... Richard Vanek
- Re: Image write disable token i... Mark Heieis
- Re: Image write disable tok... Richard Vanek
- Re: Image write disable tok... René Seindal
- Re: Image write disable tok... Romano Giannetti
- Re: Image write disable tok... Mark Heieis
- Re: Image write disable token inste... dt-list
- Re: [darktable-user] Undo in lightable? Greg Minshall