To me it seems, that this entire discussion circles around a covetousness, that images should appear better or sharper on screen, than they are in reality
Regards Peter > Am 02.02.2021 um 22:58 schrieb Pascal Obry <pas...@obry.net>: > > Le mardi 02 février 2021 à 19:34 +0100, Kneops a écrit : >> Well, I think I started this kind of 'topic' several times, because >> this is also my experience with using DT for a few years and one of >> the big reasons why I'm using LR for now (shame shame). > > This sounds really like a troll discussion, right! All this come from > OP saying "with both DT and RT using minimal intervention" ! Sure both > have probably different defaults, but saying that dt sharpness is not > good is a plain non sense to me. The sharpness in dt can be made way > above the bearable limit of visual correctness. > > But maybe you at your image at 1cm with a magnifying glass? Just do a > print, expose it and loot at it with correct lightning. > > BTW, if dt has no good sharpness what should we say of beautiful prints > made with film roll? > > -- > Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) > > The best way to travel is by means of imagination > > http://www.obry.net > > gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
