On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Jean Forget wrote: > There *is* a difference between Date:: and Time:: namespaces. Date:: > modules do not consider durations less than one day. I did not choose > at random between Date:: and Time:: for my module, neither did Rich > Bowen (Discordian), Abigail (Maya), Leo Cacciari (Roman), Mordechai > Abzug (Julian and Hebraic) and Tom Braun (Date::Tolkien::Shire).
Um, Date::Calc, Date::Manip, Date::ICal, and numerous other Date:: modules _all_ deal with units less than one day. > Why not simply Calendar::Chinese and Calendar::Discordian? and by the way, > why not also Calendar::Leapyear and Calendar::Passover? Because I want it to be clear if a given module fits into the overall suite or not. Basically, if it starts with DateTime, it'll inter-operate with all the other modules in the suite. That assumes that other people don't just randomly upload DateTime:: crap, which is a big assumption, of course ;) > I would not mind renaming my module Calendar::French_Rev, but I think > the DateTime:: namespace is very inapproriate. Hours, minutes and > seconds are not taken in account in my module. Using the DateTime:: > would induce users to think hhmmss are taken into account. If it is renamed to DateTime::Calendar::FrenchRevolution, it'll have to deal with hhmmss. It's that simple. -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
