On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > I presume this is actually intentional: > > > > t/03components....ok 19/44Can't locate object method "ical" via package > > "DateTime" at t/03components.t line 36. > > > > If so, could you please remove the tests that require this method, so > > that we can have a passing test suite. > > > > Along that same line: > > > > Warning: the following files are missing in your kit: > > t/05ical.t > > > > That test was removed intentionally? If so, please remove from MANIFEST > > also. > > Oops, yep. It was all intentional. The contents of t/05ical.t will be > used for DateTime::Formats::ICal though. I will check that in soon, but > I'm still trying to decide between "Format" and "Formats", since I > realized they _both_ have trouble when interpreted as a verb, so I'm now > leaning back towards Format because nothing else is likely to be plural.
+1 for singular. I don't like plural class names. -- Nothing is perfekt. Certainly not me. Success to failure. Just a matter of degrees.
