On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Rich Bowen wrote: > > There's still lots left to do but what is written so far seems to work > > reasonably well, so getting it out there into people's hands seems like a > > good idea. > > Should I also release DateTime::Event::FourthofJuly for the sake of ... > well, for the sake of something?
Sure, but I think maybe the API should change. If it's just going to return a DateTime.pm object maybe the method shouldn't be new, but something else (like fourth_of_july?) -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
