Another reference, nice to read:
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52475.html
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Martin Hasch
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Dave Rolsky
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Dave Rolsky
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Peter J. Acklam
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 fglock
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Lawrence K. Hixson
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Eugene van der Pijll
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Dave Rolsky
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Rick Measham
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Dave Rolsky
- Re: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Rick Measham
- RE: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Peter J. Acklam
- RE: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Peter J. Acklam
- RE: There _is_ a (Gregorian) year 0 Peter J. Acklam
