Dave:

If I understand you correctly, your module is using "Calendrical Calculations"
as an "algorithmic bible" because the LISP code is so amenable to Perl
conversion.  They are not the only calendric gospel around.  Can you
accomodate either case with flags/switches?

I assert, rhetorically perhaps, that historical projection of a proleptic
Gregorian calendar is of such limited value because (IMO) most if not all
published literature has not and will not in our life times normalize their
date reckoning to any universal calendar (like Star Date a la Star Trek).

Most if not all extant manuscripts use the date reckoning most familiar to the
author's own method be it dynastic, Year # of Herod's rule, Julian, or
Gregorian depending upon circa.  Even the Gregorian acceptance also varied by
country/prov/state by date as well.

My final assertion is this:  since the Gregorian Calendar functions as our
"civil calendar" today comparable to the Julian Calendar did before it AND
since the Julian doesn't recognize year zero, a proleptic Gregorian should not
accept it either.

Since most astronomers use the Julian Date System (JD numbers) a proleptic
Gregorian with year zero doesn't help them either.

Enough said.  I'm done with this topic, unless provoked or simulated otherwise
<g>.
Larry

FYI: "Herod the Great:" Roman king of Judea (37 BC to 4 AD) that was 40 years
not 41 years!

Dave Rolsky wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Lawrence K. Hixson wrote:
>
> > I found the reference on the web to this question which I believe adds
> > weight to Abigail's assertion:
> >
> > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/millennium.html
> >
> > Be sure to read last paragraph at link above!
>
> But in chapter 2 of Calendrical Calculations, they say:
>
>  Although the Gregorian calendar did not exist priot to the sixteenth
>  century, we can extrapolate backwrads using its rules to obtain what is
>  sometimes referred to the as the "proleptic Gregorian calendar," which we
>  implement in the next section.  Unlike the Julian calendar, this
>  proleptic calendar _does_ have a year 0.
>
> They then go on to define the epoch of the Gregorian calendar as year 1,
> meaning -1 BC is year 0.  That's what DateTime.pm does too.
>
> -dave
>
> /*=======================
> House Absolute Consulting
> www.houseabsolute.com
> =======================*/

Reply via email to