Hi,

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:48:09AM +0000, Nick Hilliard via db-wg wrote:
> One possible option to work around this limitation would be to create a 
> new db object type, "sso-set", which could contain a list of SSO account 
> names, e.g.:
> 
> sso-set:  FOOBAR1-RIPE
> descr:    List of SSO tokens for no.foobar
> members:  f...@example.com
> members:  b...@example.org
> mnt-by:   TBD1-RIPE
> source:   RIPE
> 
> Each LIR would be able to define sso-sets with arbitrary contents and 
> tie them to objects, e.g. like this:
> 
> auth: SSO-SET FOOBAR1-RIPE
> 
> There would need to be some thought put into how to handle mnt-by: for 
> the sso-set object (quis custodiet ipsos custodes)?

Not sure how that is better than what we have today?

Tore's problem statement is "I have added a user to the LIR portal and
I do not want to subsequently update a database object to give DB privs
to said user" - SSO-SET won't help with that problem statement.

Your case would help a LIR that has umpteen different mntner: objects
that should all use the same (sub-)set of SSO credentials, and you want
to update them in a single place.

While I can see that use case, it's solving a different problem.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to