* Cynthia Revström via db-wg > I have to agree with this, so if I have understood everything what we are > currently looking at is something like: > > mntner: TEST1-MNT > admin-c: TEST-RIPE > auth: SSO-LIR no.foobar > mnt-by: TEST1-MNT > source: RIPE > > mntner: TEST2-MNT > admin-c: TEST-RIPE > auth: SSO-LIR no.foobar group1 > mnt-by: TEST2-MNT > source: RIPE > > mntner: TEST3-MNT > admin-c: TEST-RIPE > auth: SSO-LIR no.foobar group2 > mnt-by: TEST3-MNT > source: RIPE > > Person 1 -> Access to TEST1-MNT > Person 2 | group1 -> Access to TEST1-MNT, and TEST2-MNT > Person 3 | group1, group2 -> Access to TEST1-MNT, TEST2-MNT, and TEST3-MNT > > Is this what all of you are also thinking of?
The TEST1-MNT part of would cater for my use case. The TEST2-MNT and TEST3-MNT parts of it are irrelevant to me (but I have no objections to such functionality per se). In any case I would like to second Nick's comment about not being too prescriptive about how it ends up being implemented, though. As long as the basic desired functionality is provided for, I don't really care about how it ends up looking. The product owners and developers are in a better position to make those calls and I think we trust them to come up with the best solution. Tore
