Chairs, According to the process document linked to by Piotr, you are supposed to respond to NWI requests with either «yes» or «no».
More than a month has elapsed since I requested the NWI and the last message was posted to this thread. When should I expect your answer? Tore * Tore Anderson via db-wg > * Piotr Strzyzewski via db-wg > >> Look at this page >> https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/db/numbered-work-items >> and start new NWI. > > Thanks for the pointer! > > Chairs (cc-ed), could we have an NWI for this? > > Rough problem statement for the kickstart phase follows: > > There is currently no way to automatically sync the «auth: SSO x@y» > attributes for a maintainer object with the list of (non-billing) users > associated with an LIR. > > This leads to duplication of work (adding/removing newly hired/departed > LIR administrators in two places). > > Additionally, this increases the risk of unauthorised access, e.g., if an > administrator has left an LIR but was only removed from the LIR portal, > he might inappropriately retain access to manage database objects for the > LIR in question. > > It is therefore desirable to have a method to protect RIPE database > objects so that they can be maintained by the list of (non-billing) > user accounts currently associated with a specific LIR at any given > time. That is, when a RIPE NCC Access account is removed from the LIR's > user list, the database maintainer access should be automatically > revoked for that account as well. > > Tore >
