On 22/02/2022 13:33, Edward Shryane wrote:
To be clear, the Legal review looked at the "geofeed:" attribute alone, and did not consider "remarks:". There is no requirement to validate "remarks:". Given this, and thanks to your feedback, I will drop my suggestion to validate "remarks:", and update the impact analysis for "geofeed:" only.
Good! Thanks Ed! Ciao, Massimo -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
