Hi, I’m out of office till 22 August. Any RIPE Labs related queries can be sent to l...@ripe.net and one of my colleagues will get back to you.
Cheers, Alun On 22 Aug 2022, at 07:54, Alun Davies via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I’m out of office till 22 August. Any RIPE Labs related queries can be sent > to l...@ripe.net and one of my colleagues will get back to you. > > Cheers, > Alun > > On 22 Aug 2022, at 07:52, Alun Davies via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > I’m out of office till 22 August. Any RIPE Labs related queries can be sent > to l...@ripe.net and one of my colleagues will get back to you. > > Cheers, > Alun > > On 22 Aug 2022, at 07:51, Alun Davies via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > I’m out of office till 22 August. Any RIPE Labs related queries can be sent > to l...@ripe.net and one of my colleagues will get back to you. > > Cheers, > Alun > > On 22 Aug 2022, at 07:42, Alun Davies via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > I’m out of office till 22 August. Any RIPE Labs related queries can be sent > to l...@ripe.net and one of my colleagues will get back to you. > > Cheers, > Alun > > On 29 Jul 2022, at 02:57, Cynthia Revström via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote: > > Hi Denis, > > You raise some very good points and I agree with you that we should > update the purposes and establish procedures for doing so. > > Also could someone explain to me how I should interpret Article 8.3, > does that mean that the T&C can be altered by the Policy Development > Process? > Article 8.3: "Changes can also be effected through the Policy > Development Process." > Given what you said in your email I assume this is not the case but I > don't know what else it would mean. > > P.S. I assume "Daniel" is referring to dfk? > > -Cynthia > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:33 AM denis walker via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote: > > Colleagues > > My vacation is almost over and I have a lot of emails to reply to so I > will start with the topic of the day, geofeed. We have to think out of > the box here. You are all approaching this issue from the same wrong > angle. There is no point criticizing the legal team for doing their > job. The answer was actually in that review..."If the purposes of the > RIPE Database have changed". So the answer is simple, we add a new > purpose to the RIPE Database. The only problem is we have never done > this before in any formal way. We have no precedent, no process or > procedure for doing this. I am hoping someone at the RIPE NCC can help > us with establishing a process for doing this, maybe the legal team, > senior management team, Daniel, the Executive Board if we need a > resolution to be put to a GM... > > So let's first take a step back. The purposes of the RIPE Database > have become the elephant in the room, no one wants to talk about them. > The Database Task Force (DB-TF) completely sidestepped the issue. I > did warn them several times that this must be addressed, but they > ignored me (sorry guys). I tried to raise the issue at RIPE 83 but I > was heavily criticized for doing so. I could see 2 or 3 years ago that > this was a problem that would have to be addressed soon. Now we can no > longer ignore the issue. > > What are the purposes now? We had the original purposes defined in the > mid 1990s. These are the ones the DB-TF worked with. But they were > reviewed in 2010 by the Data Protection Task Force (DPTF). As a member > of the DPTF I wrote the initial draft of the RIPE Database Terms & > Conditions (T&C). This included a list of purposes in Article 3. These > extended the original set of purposes. The wording was tweaked by the > DPTF and the community and consensus was reached on this set of > purposes. But there wasn't a lot of discussion about the actual > purposes, just the wording. > > So the first question to answer is, do we take the set of purposes > listed in Article 3 of the T&C as the definitive list of current > purposes, regardless of what the DB-TF considered? > > The next question is, what new purpose would we add to cover geofeed? > Again I did make a recommendation to the DB-TF about this. I suggested > something like: > > "The RIPE Database may contain data that an agreed set of external > services may use, require or rely on." > > This purpose would cover: > -"geofeed:" > -"geoloc:" > -"language:" > -"abuse-c:" > -IRT object > -use of ROLE objects for contacts for external services like RIPE Atlas > > None of the above list are covered by any of the purposes currently > defined in the T&C. We would then have to define somewhere the 'agreed > set of external services'. > > If we want to add a new purpose we then need to establish a procedure > for doing this with community consent. There is no policy on the > purposes of the RIPE Database so the PDP would not work here. As the > RIPE Database is a service provided by the RIPE NCC and covered by a > set of legally binding T&C, it may need a resolution by the GM to > change the T&C. There is also the issue of how any new purpose may > (legally) impact on the existing data contained within the database > and any consent that has been given for the use of that data. > > Daniel said in Iceland that it is "time to stop tinkering around the > edges of the RIPE Database and address some of the fundamental > issues". I think this is an appropriate moment to add a new purpose > and work through the whole process of doing so. Maybe we can sort it > out by RIPE 85 in case we do need to involve the GM. I suspect we may > do this again once we establish the process. > > cheers > denis > co-chair DB-WG > > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 13:33, Maria Stafyla via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > Following the legal update we provided on NWI-13: Geofeed at the DB WG > session at RIPE 84, here is our analysis in case further discussion on this > topic is needed. > > Executive Summary: > > - The RIPE Database is meant to contain specific information for its > documented purposes. > > - Information inserted in the geofeed attribute could in some cases > qualify as personal data. > > - The current purposes could explain geolocation information to be > inserted only for ‘scientific research into network operations and topology’. > > - This purpose does not justify the processing of personal data; > therefore restrictions had to be put in place to avoid the processing of > unnecessary personal data. > > - The restrictions are now implemented based on the status of the > registration. > > - If the purposes of the RIPE Database have changed in the meantime, > this should be established via the community processes and documented. In > that case we will re-evaluate the situation and the need for restrictions. > Until then, the restrictions remain necessary. > > > Legal Analysis: > > The RIPE Database is meant to contain specific information for the purposes > that are defined in the RIPE Database Terms and Conditions. > > In terms of the _personal data_ inserted in there, the purpose that justifies > its publication is to facilitate the coordination of network operations for > the smooth and uninterrupted operation of Internet; this purpose explains why > contact details of resource holders or their appointed contact persons are > required. > > Before any new type of personal data is permitted to be inserted in the RIPE > Database, we must evaluate if their processing is required for the purposes > already defined and their processing can be considered in line with the basic > personal data processing principles. > > Although it is the responsibility of the party inserting personal data to > ensure that they have the appropriate legal grounds before doing so, the RIPE > NCC has also shared responsibilities with regards to the personal data in the > RIPE Database. This is because the RIPE NCC is the party that is making the > RIPE Database available and implements the instructions given by the RIPE > community. > > As mentioned in the Legal Review Impact Analysis, if the geofeed attribute is > inserted for registrations of assignments that are reasonably assumed to be > related to one individual user, then the attribute will be considered as > containing personal data and GDPR will apply. This is why we have proposed to > implement restrictions. > > These restrictions are essential to avoid any processing of personal data > that is not required or necessary for the currently defined purposes of the > RIPE Database and to limit the RIPE NCC's liability as a party with shared > responsibilities in relation to the personal data inserted in the RIPE > Database. > > Regarding the _(non-personal) data _inserted in the RIPE Database, it is also > paramount that only data that is needed for the defined purposes of the RIPE > Database is inserted. > > According to the RIPE Database Terms and Conditions, introducing the geofeed > attribute (with restrictions) would be considered in line and acceptable to > be used only for scientific research into network operations and topology > (see Art. 3). > > We also understand that the purposes the RIPE Database must fulfil are not > static but evolve over time. > > The RIPE Database Requirements Task Force has recently concluded its work > and, with regard to geolocation, it has established that, although there is > an active user group for geolocation data, geolocation itself is not an > objective that the RIPE Database should fulfil. > > If the community's interests have changed since then and it is now agreed > that geolocation is one of the purposes the RIPE Database must fulfil, this > should be decided via the community's processes and reflected in the RIPE > Database Terms and Conditions. > > In line with the data management principles proposed by the RIPE Database > Requirements Task Force, it would be prudent to approach this issue > holistically, taking into account that other geolocation information is > already provided in the RIPE Database (i.e. geoloc, country code attributes > in ORG and resource objects). > > On the basis of a new purpose for the geolocation information, we could then > reassess the situation to understand whether the restrictions on the geofeed > attribute are still necessary or whether it is justified to process personal > data for this purpose. > > Kind regards, > > Maria Stafyla > Senior Legal Counsel > RIPE NCC > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg