Job Snijders via db-wg wrote on 20/11/2022 13:07:
I'd argue that the rules for what constitute valid hierarchical names should not be changed; so the second component of the name doesn't need to start with 'AS-'.
you mean "does need to start with 'AS-'"? I don't see how rfc2622 allows naked terms, or how that would allow rpsl consumers to determine what type of set a specific named item was.
Nick -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
