On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Tue 25 Feb 2003 10:27, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:41:54PM -0500, Rudy Lippan wrote: > > >
> > > If 5005, does it have unicode support or should the unicode > > > functions be #ifdefed out? And along the same lines, is unicode support in > > > 5.6 stable enough to be used by the DBDs? > > > > Probably, but I've never had to dig into it. > > IMHO the first perl that had Unicode that was stable enough *and* reliable and > had reasonable DWIM levels was 5.7.3 (and 5.8.0) > > Unicode support was my main incentive to bump all production perls (also with > customer sites) to 5.8.0 (in which I also included the defined-or patches) > > So I guess I will just set up so that pg_enable_utf8 will default to off for the next release of DBD::Pg, and then for the release after that have it pg_enable_utf8 default to on when using perl >= 5.8. Thanks all, -r
