On Mon, 21 May 2001, Paul D. Smith wrote:
[...]
> I'm quite familiar with the reply-to munging arguments, and I fully
> subscribe to the side of the fence that condemns reply-to munging, I
> don't want that setting changed.
>
> My comment was that I was receiving two copies of the mail where the
> first one was addressed to me only, without the list in the Cc: line
> anywhere. It looked exactly like a private message. I replied to it,
> only to the sender of course since that was the only address in the
> headers.
>
> Then an hour later, I would get a copy via the list as well with more
> headers than the first copy.
Ah, forward the mails in question with full headers to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and I'll take a look. It sounds like a borken MUA somewhere else.
> I'm on a _LOT_ of mailing lists and this is the first time I've seen
> anything like that. I use Emacs VM and Gnus to read my mail; I know
> it's not a puny MUA problem :).
:-)
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
