On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:49:49PM -0400, Ashley Pond V wrote: > I did say MST RFC:MUST be respected. :P This is only here because of > you. I was an early CDBI user and was there for the fights over its > direction and saw you as the voice of reason, patience, and vision. > Regardless of work done since, I see you as the owner. I was unaware > there was as much of a schism as there apparently is. > > I don't know which approach is better. I feel the "permanent > development ban" you assert is misrepresenting the situation.
Well, I'm not sure how else I can interpret riba's call for a 'project freeze', especially given that in http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2016-October/012210.html he appears to feel that the previous contributors attempting to continue the project is "the worst possible direction, one I worked really hard to save this codebase from." Of course, it would help if he'd elaborate on his plan; so far, sadly, he's expended a lot more words explaining why his future plans for DBIx::Class aren't the contributors' or users' business than he has explaining what said plans actually are. Hopefully that will change. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team. _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk