On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 23:32:18 +0200, rabbit+dbic at <rabbit.us> wrote:
Nevertheless, if nobody else finds this problematic: I will step aside and let an eager community, inadvertently suppressed all these years, steer this project further.
Honestly, if anything i'd love to see a solution that offends everyone equally. You preparing your feature-frozen-bugfix-only release in a different namespace; mst's plan being used in the DBIx::Class namespace. That way people who're worried can stick to a stable branch of dbic, and people who actually need more from DBIc at some point in the future aren't lost in limbo. There's no need to deprive your stable-needing users of the work you had planned to do, nor your far future users of a useful library, if both can be served at the same time. -- With regards, Christian Walde _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
