On 10/04/2016 04:17 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
Since people seem to be unsure as to what the alternative to riba's project
freeze would actually be, let me provide something a little more concrete.
This is intended as a basis for discussion rather than a complete plan, but
I thought it was worth at least sketching a shape for things to come.
1) I think at this point we should formalise a core team. The BDFL model
was nice while it lasted, but I don't think it's tenable going forwards.
My first thought for composition would be a five-person team, and assuming
everybody agrees to it,that being Ilmari, Castaway (Jess Robinson), Frew,
myself, and whoever riba was planning to pass the first-come bits to.
That seems like it should be a nice combination of continuity and ensuring
that riba's fears we'll be insufficiently conservative being given a voice.
+1 to this in particular, and to the thrust of mst's proposal more
generally.
From: A frustrated user of *other* ORMs
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
