I was looking at the development task list today, and thinking that there are a lot of table changes scheduled for the 2.1 series. It doesn't look like we're going to be changing any of the existing tables, but just adding new tables to support config data, Sieve scripts and parsed headers.
The one thing that really strikes me as changing is the table prefixes. As part of my effort to push through changes that we want for a stable, long lived dbmail 2.0 branch, I think we should have table prefixes of 'dbmail_'. In 2.1, we might add the code for fully configurable names, but start with a default of 'dbmail_' just like it would be in 2.0. Yes, no, maybe? Aaron
