Matthew T. O'Connor <[email protected]> said: > Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote: > > > > It is possible to just skip 2.0 release and head for a 2.1 with a fixed > > short term date for feature freeze. Not ideal of course. > > IMHO, No. It's important for the project to release 2.0, there are lots > of improvements over 1.x, and the 2.1 desired feature list looks to me > as if it will take months if not a year to accomplish. > > The only question is when to relase 2.0 and what changes should be made > at this point.
Yes, exactly. We need 2.0 -- even if we called 2.0rc7 as 2.0, we'd be in a good place. My argument is that we glossed over a number of usability issues while trying to make the core application work. We meant to get these usability improvement done before 2.0 and despite jumping the gun on the release candidates, we should nevertheless make these specific changes. Aaron --
