Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Ilja Booij wrote: > >> >> Yup.. that's solution number four. >> >> Because it's such a recent addition, (almost) nobody has been using >> it. So there's less pain when we remove it. >> I agree with Paul on this. Adding user+mailbox address support >> recently was a mistake. I shouldn't have committed that code. It can >> be added later. Removing it will take away the problem mentioned above. >> >> I'll get to it then. >> > Aaron, am I right in thinking that we only need to revert main.c back to > revision 1.61? >
1.61 has the first set of changes, so we'd go back to 1.60: http://cvs.dbmail.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/dbmail/main.c.diff?r1=1.60&r2=1.64&f=h Aaron --
