[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > ====================================================================== > Date Submitted: 16-Sep-04 19:20 CEST > Last Modified: 07-Oct-04 19:47 CEST > ====================================================================== > Summary: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption > type when not ask to > Description: > dbmail-users changes the encryption type even when no such change is > requested. > ====================================================================== [snip] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > aaron - 07-Oct-04 18:52 CEST > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > I double checked the patch against dbmail_2_0_branch, and it applies > cleanly with a 6 line offset. We'll have to revisit it in HEAD, because it > probably is using the wrong set of auth_* / db_* calls. > > Paul, you made the 'upstream' auth/db changes, would you mind taking a > look at this patch? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > paul - 07-Oct-04 19:47 CEST > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Aaron, > > what do you mean the auth calls were moved back to db_? Not in the cvs > repo I'm using... >
Oh, sorry, it was just the alias functions. That does make some sense, although FYI, in my LDAP code there are implementations for aliases. It also makes sense to have database aliases coexist with LDAP aliases. We'll have to revisit this at some point. But, for now, we're in good shape with this patch for both HEAD and dbmail_2_0_branch. Aaron --
