Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Ilja Booij wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:17:31 +0100, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will do. I'll commit the transactional_inserts and is_header patches
on the 2.0
branch.
Let's release this Monday then, OK?
Does the above mentioned is_header patch include the changes to
dbmail-util that update the is_header field for 2.0.2 so that we can
enable that flag in 2.0.3?
No. That patch just activates usage of the is_header field during insertion.
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NET FACILITIES GROUP PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
