Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Does the above mentioned is_header patch include the changes to
dbmail-util that update the is_header field for 2.0.2 so that we can
enable that flag in 2.0.3?
No. That patch just activates usage of the is_header field during
insertion.
Ok, so just to be clear, the patch also does NOT use the is_header yet
correct?
The patch does use the is_header field during insertions by setting the is_header field on messageblks as
required. So yes, the field is definitely used for new messages.
Anyone plan on adding the doing the is_header updating check to
dbmail-util prior to the 2.0.2 release?
Aaron's field.
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NET FACILITIES GROUP PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
