Paul J Stevens wrote:
Ok, so just to be clear, the patch also does NOT use the is_header yet correct?Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:Does the above mentioned is_header patch include the changes to dbmail-util that update the is_header field for 2.0.2 so that we can enable that flag in 2.0.3?No. That patch just activates usage of the is_header field during insertion.
Anyone plan on adding the doing the is_header updating check to dbmail-util prior to the 2.0.2 release?