On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:27:08 -0000, Aaron Stone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So looking back on the past three releases, they're all about 1 - 1.5
> months apart (2.0.0 -> 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2/3). That seems like a reasonable
> release rate right now, given the number of things in 2.0 that could use
> touching up or speeding up.
> 
> Not to get too far ahead of myself, I'm thinking that we should pick about
> a month's work and schedule it for 2.0.4. My speedups for ACL's and
> mailboxes are in good shape (90% releasable right now) and Paul is ready
> with ic_search speedups.
> 
> Barring any major new bugs, perhaps 2.0.4 will be the release of
> efficiency and speedup :-)
> 
<snip>
> Ilja, would you be interested in trying this approach? Or, at the least,
> figuring out some way to only make snapshots if CVS has changed?
> 

I think both these things are interesting to do. I'll put the 'Only
make a snapshot when there are changes in CVS' on my TODO-list for
tomorrow.

about 2.0.4:
Let's put out 2.0.4rc1 when ACL, mailboxes and _ic_search speedups are
in (and stable). Along with the necessary fixes for bugs etc.

Ilja

Reply via email to