Paul J Stevens wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
If we're still keeping with the Linux kernel-style version numbers, then
2.1.0 is a release only developers should be touching. Even if 2.1.0 is
rock solid, I fail to see how that benefits regular users -- the current
release plan on the wiki (albeit from Nov. 2004) says that you want
to do
header caching in 2.1.1.
True. But before I move on the 2.1.1, I need a 2.1.0 release first right?
Just to confirm (since I'm still unsure), you are saying that 2.1 is for
development not production right?
