Paul J Stevens wrote:
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
True. But before I move on the 2.1.1, I need a 2.1.0 release first
right?
Just to confirm (since I'm still unsure), you are saying that 2.1 is
for development not production right?
Absolutely!!! The whole 2.1.x series will be a development series,
whereas 2.0.x will be for stable production systems. Until 2.2.0
happens at the end of the 2.1 drive.
Good, glad that has been made crystal clear :-) But I don't think you
need a 2.1 release. 2.1 will just be CVS Head, it should probably be
tagged 2.1 at some point, but we don't need (or want) a 2.1 CVS branch.
