imap is obliged by rfc to allow simulatneous sessions; for pop we thought of it as a feature :-) A lock for pop to prevent simultaneous sessions could be implemented; any known list of pro/contra arguments?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Micah Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <dbmail@dbmail.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:24 AM Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Pop locks > > A message is marked for deletion immediatly but is not removed from the > database until the dbmail-maintenance routine is run. > > I've run concurrent session before. Unless a newer release has changed > things, POP and IMAP both are capable of running concurrent user sessions. > (with the same user) > > -Micah > > At 09:30 AM 9/25/2002 +1200, you wrote: > >Just checking so I can brief our helpdesk, I'm assuming dbmail does not lock > >the pop sessions to prohibit the same user from relogging in while another > >session is active. > > > > From my tests, it looks like any destructive change (eg deleting a message > >is honoured immediately upon a client exiting...) Is this right? > > > >/Mark > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Dbmail mailing list > >Dbmail@dbmail.org > >https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > _______________________________________________ > Dbmail mailing list > Dbmail@dbmail.org > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail >
