I think we really need to plan this properly, with a general document structure and a recognised maintainer. Additionally, deciding on what sections will be included needs consideration.
Chris On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 20:28, lou wrote: > In some email I received from Roel Rozendaal - IC&S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on > Wed, 18 Jun 2003 > 12:17:08 +0200, wrote: > > > very glad about these doc plans! > > > > dbmail.org is definitely the place to put these docs; cvs is fine with > > me, is it the way we want to do this? > > I think so, easy to update, and add automatically date automatically for the > last update > also it's very simple. > I also think LaTeX. > > Any other ideas? Since we manage to agree on the future existence of > dbmail-doc. > There're some more stuff to be discussed. Forms and stuff, blahblah you know. > > > cheers > > > > > regards roel > [...] > > >> Count me in! > > > > > > For the sake of the project, I think these things should be added to > > > dbmail.org, > > > may be CVS rep dbmail-docs? Roel what do you think? > > > > > > Sounds interesting, I'll try writing a howto and simple spec on how to > > > setup a redundant > > > mail/cluster system with dbmail:) > > > > > > me is in too!:) > _______________________________________________ > Dbmail mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
