Hi!

If I understand correctly you need to use OFFSET statement.
-----
Yury Katkov




On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Samir Bilal <samirbil...@yahoo.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
> Is it possible to do ranking in SPARQL, to get  a row given its rank from
> an ordered result. For example for the first row  we can
> use ORDER BY  DESC(?property)  and using the LIMIT clause as LIMIT 1. How
> can we get only the second or  third row for example?
>
> Best regards
> Samir
>   ------------------------------
> *De :* Patrick Cassidy <p...@micra.com>
> *À :* dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Envoyé le :* Mardi 27 Décembre 2011 1h26
> *Objet :* [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia ontology
>
>  I have looked briefly at the DBpedia ontology and it appears to leave a
> great deal to be desired in terms of what an ontology is best suited for:
> to carefully and precisely define the meanings of terms so that they can be
> automatically reasoned with by a computer, to accomplish useful tasks.  I
> will be willing to spend some time to reorganize the ontology to make it
> more logically coherent, if (1) there are any others who are interested in
> making the ontology more sound and (2) if there is a process by which that
> can be done without a very long drawn-out debate.
>
> I think that the general notion of formalizing the content of the
> WikiPedia a a great idea, but to be useful it has to be done carefully.  It
> is very easy, even for those with experience, to put logically inconsistent
> assertions into an ontology, and even easier to put in elements that are so
> underspecified that they are ambiguous to the point of being essentially
> useless for automated reasoning.  The OWL reasoner can catch some things,
> but it is very limited, and unless a first-order reasoner is used one needs
> to be exceedingly careful about how one defines the relations.
>
> I am totally new to this list, and would appreciate pointers to previous
> posts discussing such issues related to the ontology.  A quick scan of
> recent posts did not turn up anything relevant to this matter.
>
> Perhaps those who have been particularly active in building the ontology
> would be willing to discuss the matter by telephone?  This could help
> educate me and bring me up to date quickly on what has been done here.
>
> Meanwhile, Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah and Happy New Year to the
> members of this group.
>
> Pat
>
> Patrick Cassidy
> MICRA Inc.
> cass...@micra.com
> 908-561-3416
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Write once. Port to many.
> Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
> new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
> Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Write once. Port to many.
> Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
> new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
> Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to