On 21 February 2012 13:47, Richard Light <rich...@light.demon.co.uk> wrote: > Jimmy, > > Not, I'm not confused. :-) >
Fair enough. > I just thought that if the "&" were URLencoded it wouldn't need to be XML > escaped, because as you say it would then read "%26", and so wouldn't cause > problems to the XML parser. And I thought URLencoding should happen here. > To quote a random Web source [1]: That the URL isn't XML escaped in RDF/XML is clearly and unambiguously a bug; that it isn't URL escaped is more a matter for discussion, but the general consensus will probably be 'do what Wikipedia do', which is to not escape ampersands. -- <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
