Hi Juan,

On 27-Jun-14 9:06 AM, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio wrote:
charset=unicode" http-equiv=Content-Type>
Hello,
Very surprising results. The difference is so big that if you choose a random resource from the large result set, then it will probably not exist in the small result set. Have you tried? By the way, how do the live endpoints (http://live.dbpedia.org/sparql, http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com/sparql) compare to the standard endpoit (http://dbpedia.org/sparql) in terms of:
- Amount of data
- Response time
- Availability
Anybody knows about that?

http://live.dbpedia.org/sparql is currently pointing to http://dbedia-live.openlinksw.com/sparql so contain the same data. This data is updated regularly with the latest changes from Wikipedia itself.

Statistics on the update process can be found at http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com/live/

http://dbpedia.org/sparql/ is based on the 3.9 dataset as published by the dbpedia team.
It is a static dataset that is refreshed about once a year ...

So live.dbpedia.org has the newest data but in some cases dbpedia.org has some extra data from other datasets that live will not have.

As for Response time and Availability, it is a best effort project, so we make sure it runs most of the time, but we will not give guarantees for uptime and availability.

There are rate limiters and ACLs in place to make sure everyone gets a fair shot at running queries.

Those limits can cause problems for certain kind of analysis as such queries may timeout before giving meaningful data back. In such cases we strongly recommend users to setup a version of dbpedia in the cloud so they can have the same data but without competing with queries from other users.

Hope this helps.


Best Regards,
Rumi Kocis

Regards,
Juan Lucas

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*De:* A Shruti [mailto:shruti_atr...@yahoo.com]
*Enviado el:* jue 26/06/2014 20:42
*Para:* dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
*Asunto:* [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live End points return different datafor same query

Hi,
I ran the following query against the two DBPedia live endpoints mentioned on the DBpedia Live website (http://live.dbpedia.org/) and I get very different results. Does anyone know why this could be happening? Do the graphs "<http://dbpedia.org>" on these end points not contain the same data set?

Query:
PREFIX  dbo:  <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/>
PREFIX  rdf:  <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
PREFIX  dbpprop: <http://dbpedia.org/property/>

SELECT  count(*)
FROM <http://dbpedia.org>
WHERE
  { ?person rdf:type dbo:Person .
    ?person dbpprop:name ?name .
    ?person dbo:birthDate ?birthDate .
    ?person dbo:abstract ?abstract .
    ?person dbo:wikiPageID ?wikiPageID .
    ?person dbo:wikiPageRevisionID ?wikiPageRevisionID
    OPTIONAL
      { ?person dbo:wikiPageModified ?wikiPageModified }
    OPTIONAL
      { ?person dbo:wikiPageExtracted ?wikiPageExtracted }
    FILTER langMatches(lang(?abstract), "en")
  }

Result when run on end point http://live.dbpedia.org/sparql: 3792391

Result when run on end point http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com/sparql: 63450663

Thanks,
Shruti
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*CLÁUSULA DE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS*
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De acuerdo con la nueva ley Ley de Servicios de la Sociedad de la Información y Comercio Electrónico aprobada por el parlamento español y de la vigente Ley Orgánica 15/1999 de Protección de Datos española, le comunicamos que su dirección de Correo electrónico forma parte de un fichero automatizado, teniendo usted derecho de oposición, acceso, rectificación y cancelación de sus datos.

*DATA PROTECTION CLAUSE*
This message is meant for its addressee only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this message by mistake please let us know immediately by e-mail prior to destroying it. In compliance with the new Information and Electronic Commerce Society Services Law recently approved by the Spanish Parliament and with Organic Law 15/1999 currently in force, your e-mail address has been included in our computerised records in respect of which you may exercise your right to oppose, access, amend and/or cancel your personal data.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft


_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to