First of all, thank you for all your suggestions. They helped me a lot, especially from Prof. Bangerth and Jean-Paul. Many thanks ;)
I solved the assembly by listening to Prof. Bangerth's advice that I should try to implement things in a deal.II way. And after Jean-Paul told me to take a look at step-42 I realized how things are working in deal.II. Unfortunately, I have still some issues with the values. They are not the same. I believe this is dependent on the B-operator, namely the jacobians. They differ by factor 2 probably since our unit cell in deal.II is within [0,1]^dim and the C++ code uses [-1,1]^dim. But shouldn't the assembled configurational forces still be the same independent from the mapping? Here is what I got so far :) <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-P02qRjLTUlg/WIyF2LT7HFI/AAAAAAAAAEY/Ijq5N41CWT4rHDA7xQVcaWv6cV4dReJNgCLcB/s1600/config_forces1.png> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-4izOWMBkEKE/WIyF9ALYdyI/AAAAAAAAAEc/Res40g9wq7EKP-fVdufV4eZ9QkVz6EVvgCLcB/s1600/config_forces2.png> Kind regards, Seyed Ali -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
